Dr. Nigam Nuggehalli [1] The case of Xiaomi India Pvt Ltd v  State of Karnataka  (hereafter Xiaomi ), decided by the Karnataka High Court, is actually a simulation of a case because it did not yield a decision. The court remitted the case back to the Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (the ‘adjudicating officer’) to review the case once again after hearing the parties more comprehensively on the applicable law. It is likely that after the adjudicating officer has taken hi

Kedar Manoj Ammanji | Introduction This piece opens a series of précis on foundational works in private law. This précis analyses the Reliance Interest framework developed by Lon L. Fuller and William R. Purdue in their seminal two-part articles - Reliance Interest in Contract Damages I and II. Fuller and Purdue articulate three key purposes which are pursued while awarding contract damages - (a) restitution interest; (b) reliance interest; and (c) expectation interest; Rest

Anirud Raghav & Prem Vinod Parwani | I. Introduction While reading a case on the law of contracts or evidence, one will often find an...

This piece argues that the provisions on indemnity in the Indian Contract Act are a drafting anomaly, and thus essentially defunct today.

Anirud Raghav S U | Section 68 is classified under the Chapter V of the Indian Contract Act entitled “of certain relations resembling...